EN ISO 11681-9:2016 is an international standard that provides guidelines for writing professional technical articles. It covers various aspects of technical writing, including structure, formatting, and content. This article aims to explore the key elements of EN ISO 11681-9:2016 and how it can assist writers in producing effective technical articles.
Structure and Organization
One of the crucial aspects emphasized by EN ISO 11681-9:2016 is the structure and organization of a technical article. According to the standard, a well-structured article should consist of several key sections, such as an abstract, , methodology, results, discussion, conclusions, and references. Each section should serve a specific purpose and flow logically from one to the next.
Formatting and Style
EN ISO 11681-9:2016 also provides guidelines for formatting and style, which help ensure consistency and clarity in technical articles. It suggests using headings, subheadings, and numbered lists to enhance readability and facilitate easy navigation. Additionally, the standard recommends the use of figures, tables, and other visual aids whenever appropriate to support the text and convey information more effectively.
Content and Language
The content of a technical article plays a vital role in conveying information accurately and concisely. EN ISO 11681-9:2016 encourages writers to provide clear objectives, methods, and results to enable readers to understand and evaluate the research. Moreover, the standard emphasizes the use of plain language and avoiding jargon or excessive technical terms that may hinder comprehension.
In conclusion, EN ISO 11681-9:2016 provides valuable guidelines and recommendations for writing professional technical articles. By following the structure, formatting, and content suggestions outlined in the standard, writers can produce articles that are well-organized, readable, and accessible to a wider audience. This standard serves as a useful tool for those seeking to enhance their technical writing skills and effectively communicate their research findings.
Nina She